Let the “No” define you and the “Yes” inspire…

I can not stop thinking about how good it felt after a sales meeting when a president of a local grocery store said, “I can not go with your coffee because It would be like shooting myself in the head.” What he was saying in my perspective is: you do not represent what I want.

Stop for just one min and contemplate that:

“Your product is not what I want.”

This is a phrase communicated though out the day in the economy of people. We are communicating all the time about what we want and what we do not want.

“Let the No define you and the Yes inspire you…” rang in my ear as I walked out that meeting late one night.

What people want defines who they are. When we cloud what we want with words from another vocabulary we miscommunicate to people. When we do not say what we mean we miscommunicate and confuse others. Then we become frustrated by the no, the passive aggressive no.

The metaphor of product as people is a bit controversial, and I enjoy entering in the conversation of consumerism a “buzz” word that interests me.

Here is what I hear when I listen to people talking about consumerism as bad.
I hear:

“you must watch what you buy”
“scrutinize every purchase”
“become a conservationist”
“don’t buy certain things”

I hear a generalization of the natural order of society, which is production and consumption.

I am a producer and people I sell to are consumers or customers. In order to make a transaction I need to connect to the basic need of that person, to consume what I produce.

What I am saying is this, most people are extremely picky about what they buy or do not buy, and in doing so, put people in catagories intentionally or unintentionally by what they buy. The conversation I have been apart of is more about categorizing people than it is about responsibility.

Here are some questions:
Is it more sustainable or socially responsible for a low income family to shop at Walmart?
Can the only middle and upper class families shop green?

A reflection on communion as talked about in the gospels/acts.

Jesus used the consumption language in communion and it dumbfounds me to this day.
Are we suppose to consume relationships?
Are we missing the point of relationships by categorizing people by what they consume?

For example:
Do we love overweight people less? (they consume a lot of food, right?)
Do we judge someone who wares a t-shirt that represents something we resent.

Have our judgments become resentments leading to categories for people? Affect they way we treat others.

Here is what I have observed.

People are starting to judge others and make cases against others,
The question being asked is who is in and out of their community.
Who is lost and does not get it?
Are they worth talking to and listening to what they say?

Is what they represent not what you are looking for and therefor like shooting yourself in the head?

Here is what I know:
Jesus brought those outside of the religious community in, and he even consumed or took part in unholly things, like wine and healing on the sabbath. I like how confusing Jesus becomes when we put him in our context and I like how simple the gospel becomes when we look at the gospel story literally.

Side note: I hope this was as fun to read as it was to write

Comments.

  • Comment by: KrisAnne

    1

    01/23/08 9:24 AM | Comment Link |

    I think you are right on, but what does this mean for what we talked about at our class in December? …the idea that “with our money, we have a voice”?

    So true that we should not label people or judge people for how or where they spend their money… but money is powerful, and I have recently felt so much peace about THOUGHTFULLY spending my money, instead of being a naive or blind consumer….

    I guess the problem arises when I expect others to live life the way I do…. judgment is the problem…

    Any thoughts?

What do you have to say?.

Mail (will not be published) (required)